← All runslive api

The contract

Metaintro Chat’s promise: tell us what you need — we return relevant, quality job results based on your ask, verified daily, no ghost jobs.

The claim SQA tests: The jobs returned by Metaintro Chat answer what the user asked for, judged by an LLM ensemble against the query and the user's profile. (claim C8).

This run tested the system against its contract, clause by clause. A single run can only witness some clauses; the rest stay UNKNOWN — never a faked pass.

0 pass · 0 fail · 13 unknown

C0 MUST
Headline promise
could-not-evaluate — no relevancy score in this run
UNKNOWN
C1 MUST
User can sign in
no 'login' step in this run
UNKNOWN
C2 MUST
User can open a new thread
no 'open-thread' step in this run
UNKNOWN
C3 SHOULD
Onboarding gate completes
no 'onboarding' step in this run
UNKNOWN
C4 SHOULD
Filters from onboarding don't bias the query
no 'clear-filters' step in this run
UNKNOWN
C5 MUST
User-typed query is what the engine sees
no 'submit-query' step in this run
UNKNOWN
C6 MUST
The chat returns job cards
no 'wait-for-jobs' step in this run
UNKNOWN
C7 MUST
Job cards have required fields
no 'card-shape' step in this run
UNKNOWN
C8 MUST
Returned jobs are relevant to the query · HEADLINE
could-not-evaluate — no relevancy score in this run
UNKNOWN
C9 SHOULD
All aspects of the query are covered
could-not-evaluate — no relevancy score in this run
UNKNOWN
C10 SHOULD
Score holds across reruns
needs a sweep — a single run cannot witness this clause — needs a sweep
UNKNOWN
C11 SHOULD
Competitive vs LinkedIn / Indeed / Google
needs a sweep — a single run cannot witness this clause — needs a sweep
UNKNOWN
C12 MAY
Run completes within budget
needs a sweep — a single run cannot witness this clause — needs a sweep
UNKNOWN

TL;DR · 30-second primer

·Metaintro Chat (SUT) ran 1 run on behalf of 1 seeker (P1, Lena Park).
·The chat returned 0 jobs. The judge scored them.
·Result: Job-Seeker Index 0/100. Not relevant— see “Why this verdict” (each gap maps to a claim in the Contract).
·Compared to 3 competitors (LinkedIn / Indeed / Google) further down.

1 ·THE VERDICT

the answer in one number

30-day JSI history

METAINTRO CHAT · JSI SWEEP · RUN #27

Not relevant.

Run #27 of metaintro-chat on profile P1 for the query "deploy verification". Job-Seeker Index 0/100.

2 ·WHY THIS VERDICT

ranked by severity

No gaps reported for this run.

3 ·THE STORY

what went in, what came out

Input

the same input was run against all 4 platforms

Query

Job-seeker profile

P1LenaMid-Senior IC Engineer P2MarcusCareer Switcher · Finance → Data P3AdaoraEarly Career / New Grad P4Wei-ChengSenior Specialist · ML Infra P5SofíaNon-Technical · Product Marketing

Skills

(no skill inferred)

ESCO —

Industry

Computer Systems Design

NAICS 541512

Location

United States

ISO US

Education

Bachelor or equivalent

ISCED ISCED 6

Output · jobs returned

Title	Company	Location	Posted	Link
No jobs returned.

4 ·THE BENCHMARK

vs. LinkedIn, Indeed, Google

Benchmark · 4 platforms × 7 axes

Metaintro (us)
LinkedIn
Indeed
Google

Capability matrix · platforms × axes

Platform	Recognition	Specificity	Reachability	Recency	Match quality	Hostility filter	Salary surface	Overall
Metaintro ·us								65
LinkedIn								63
Indeed								50
Google								56

5 ·SESSION RECORDING

watch the probe drive each platform

Session recording

watch what the probe actually saw

6 ·RUN MECHANICS

provenance & reproducibility

Duration

5.00s

Steps

—

Judges

—

Commit

—

Started

2026-05-29 03:00 UTC

Trace

Evidence by step

every artifact, link, excerpt, row, metric & recording — grouped by the step that produced it

No evidence recorded for this run.

Evidence integrity

each artifact is SHA-256 hashed at capture — proof it is unmodified

No integrity manifest recorded for this run.

7 ·SYSTEM ANATOMY

which component drove the verdict

This run carries no per-component probe data, so only system is shown. When a run exercises external components (Chat Engine, MongoDB, OpenRouter…), each appears here with its own health and the verdict driver is highlighted.

Press ⌘K to search