Skip to content
SQA Cockpit
← All runslive api
The contract
kai’s promise: store what matters and recall it on demand — surface the right memory for the ask, ranked, with no relevant memory missed.
The claim SQA tests: The jobs the metaintro-chat search engine returned, in the chat thread, are relevant to what the user asked for. (claim C0).
This run tested the system against its contract, clause by clause. A single run can only witness some clauses; the rest stay UNKNOWN — never a faked pass.
1 pass · 0 fail · 7 unknown
  • C0 MUST
    Headline promise
    relevancy score = 88/100 (pass-band ≥ 60)
    PASS
  • C1 MUST
    User can sign in
    no 'login' step in this run
    UNKNOWN
  • C2 MUST
    User can open a new thread
    no 'open-thread' step in this run
    UNKNOWN
  • C3 SHOULD
    Onboarding gate completes
    no 'onboarding' step in this run
    UNKNOWN
  • C4 SHOULD
    Filters from onboarding don't bias the query
    no 'clear-filters' step in this run
    UNKNOWN
  • C5 MUST
    User-typed query is what the engine sees
    no 'submit-query' step in this run
    UNKNOWN
  • C10 SHOULD
    Score holds across reruns
    needs a sweep — a single run cannot witness this clause — needs a sweep
    UNKNOWN
  • C12 MAY
    Run completes within budget
    needs a sweep — a single run cannot witness this clause — needs a sweep
    UNKNOWN
TL;DR · 30-second primer
  • ·KAI (SUT) ran 1 run on profile longmem-phase-a.
  • ·Result: Memory Recall Index 88/100. Strong recall— see “Why this verdict” (each gap maps to a claim in the Contract).

1 ·THE VERDICT

the answer in one number
30-day MRI history
KAI · MEMORY RECALL · RUN #23

Strong recall.

Run #23 of kai on profile longmem-phase-a for the query "MRI sweep — memory-recall". Memory Recall Index 88/100.

Verdict PASS: every step completed cleanly; nothing pulled the verdict down.

AI synthesis · openai/gpt-4o-mini

The system successfully completed the memory-recall task, achieving a strong JSI score of 88 out of 100. This high score indicates effective performance in recalling memory related to the MRI sweep. The entire process took 37.5 seconds, demonstrating efficiency in execution.

2 ·WHY THIS VERDICT

ranked by severity
No gaps reported for this run.

3 ·THE STORY

what went in, what came out

Input

what the probe sent in
Query
Skills
(no skill inferred)
ESCO —
Industry
Computer Systems Design
NAICS 541512
Location
United States
ISO US
Education
Bachelor or equivalent
ISCED ISCED 6

5 ·SESSION RECORDING

watch what the probe saw

Session recording

watch what the probe actually saw
No recording available for Metaintro.

6 ·RUN MECHANICS

provenance & reproducibility
Duration
37.54s
Steps
1
Judges
—
Commit
demo-seed
Started
2026-05-26 13:00 UTC
Trace

Evidence by step

every artifact, link, excerpt, row, metric & recording — grouped by the step that produced it

No evidence recorded for this run.

Evidence integrity

each artifact is SHA-256 hashed at capture — proof it is unmodified

No integrity manifest recorded for this run.

7 ·SYSTEM ANATOMY

which component drove the verdict

Every component held — no failure attributed.

Press ⌘K to search